On Jan 3, 6:42pm, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
} Tom Spindler <dog...@babymeat.com> wrote:
} > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:20:45PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
} > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:18:09PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
} > > > Linking against libstdc++ wastes space and time at runtime.
} > > >
} > > > [...]
} > > >
} > > > I guess you are working on clang support, so leaking libsupc++ into
} > > > the build gets in your way. Please, instead of always linking
} > > > libstdc++ make it possible for a c++ program to express "i don't need
} > > > libstdc++" in a clean way.
} > >
} > > That's a fine idea, but, really, if you're concerned about space and
} > > time at runtime, don't use C++ at all.
} >
} > Wasn't the mdocml(?) package suppossed to eliminate the need for
} > groff in tools/ and/or in base?
}
} Preferably, the elimination of need for C++ compiler in tools as well.
Word is that GCC is being converted to C++. And, if memory
serves, CLANG is written in C++ too.
}-- End of excerpt from Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
