Le 13/05/12 13:24, Martin Husemann a écrit :
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 01:04:15PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
Are you sure that moving to low priority xcalls is the way to go? You
can end up with CPUs not being updated because they are offline.
Curiously, while I could reproduce the crash before this commit, I am
unable to reproduce it in any testing without the actual ucode update
happening - and I can not spot a bug in the xcall code that tries to make
sure the number of cpus that did run the callback is == the expected count
before returning.
This clearly needs full analyzis.
Any quick pointer on the crash in question so I can take a look? I
probably missed it on port-i386/amd64.
--
Jean-Yves Migeon
jeanyves.mig...@free.fr
