On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 01:04:15PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: > Are you sure that moving to low priority xcalls is the way to go? You > can end up with CPUs not being updated because they are offline.
Curiously, while I could reproduce the crash before this commit, I am unable to reproduce it in any testing without the actual ucode update happening - and I can not spot a bug in the xcall code that tries to make sure the number of cpus that did run the callback is == the expected count before returning. This clearly needs full analyzis. Martin
