"M. Warner Losh" <i...@bsdimp.com> writes: > In message: <87r5yv4rqn....@snark.cb.piermont.com> > "Perry E. Metzger" <pe...@piermont.com> writes: > : > : "M. Warner Losh" <i...@bsdimp.com> writes: > : > What I didn't glean from the discussion is what, exactly, you were > : > going to do about it and what, exactly, you'd like to harmonize with > : > FreeBSD on. It may have been there, but I just missed it. > : > : Documentation. It would involve making all man pages refer consistently > : to FFS, FFSv1, FFSv2, and not to mix in the references to UFS. > > Documentation is easy, and I'll be happy to bring over the changes.
Given divergence, it may be more of a question of greping your documentation for variants on "UFS" and fixing them than of bringing over NetBSD changes. > Output of programs and/or input via config file changes is harder... I don't think that there are more than a trivial number of programs that refer directly to ufs in their user interface. However, searching the documentation would also find those (if any). Perry -- Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com
