On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 07:51:41PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > I've missed much of the discussion, can someone recap exactly what > you'd like to see changed? That would be the starting point for any > user-visisble changes to FreeBSD...
There is currently a mixed naming convention when refering to FFS filesystems (v1 and v2). Sometimes, it is FFS, FFS2, UFS, UFS2 etc. The consensus in NetBSD was to consistently use FFS and FFSv2. UFS2 is bad, as it changes the underlaying inode format, but still has FFS on top. Joerg
