On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 08:03:54AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > I suggested that to ad in private email earlier. UFS1 is still good for > > small file systems because it has less overhead. > > Is the possible overhead noticeable on the modern CPU? > If not, it's okay to change default per port basis > because users can still change it to UFS1 manually.
It is not about CPU, it is about disk space usage. Inodes are twice the size and that sums up depending on the file system size. Joerg
