Martin Husemann <mar...@duskware.de> writes: > On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 01:13:38AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: >> Like this? > > Looks good - one more evil idea: do we know the size of the target disk > at this point already? (I think so...) > We could make UFS2 the default for everything > 50GB or some arbitrary > threshold.
I suggested that to ad in private email earlier. UFS1 is still good for small file systems because it has less overhead. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com
