Buffered this! On 1 October 2015 at 14:43, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another: https://twitter.com/dajbelshaw/status/649502785688469504 > > On 12 September 2015 at 01:20, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> LGTM. This does read very well and I'd be keen to reach out - Ed, I'll >> wait for your call on that! >> >> Joe >> >> On 12 September 2015 at 00:46, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> From @wikimedia: >>> https://twitter.com/terakasorotany/status/640233691478929409 >>> >>> (That's https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jagwar in case someone >>> want to contact him about syndicating the post or such. Chances to >>> cover Wiktionary are rare ... ) >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Gregory Varnum < >>> [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Responses below. >>> >> >>> >> -greg >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:57 AM, James Alexander < >>> [email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Thoughts inline >>> >> >>> >> James Alexander >>> >> Community Advocacy >>> >> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> from @wikipedia and @mediawiki: >>> >>> https://twitter.com/wikidata/status/631460768249200641 >>> >>> >>> >> No real issues from mediawiki but this one worries me a bit from >>> >> @wikipedia. It just sounds a bit too technical/inside baseball. Even >>> I read >>> >> it and went "arbitrary access? WTF is that?" before thinking harder >>> and >>> >> realizing they mean being able to call within templates etc. I worry >>> that >>> >> the vast majority of our audience would have no idea what this is. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Agree that it is appropriate for @mw - seems less so for @wp >>> >> >>> > OK, done from @mediawiki only. No strong feelings about that one, but >>> just >>> > as a general remark I think there is often value in (re)tweeting >>> something >>> > that might not be 100% accessible to all followers, but gives even >>> laypeople >>> > sort of an ambient sense of awareness ("OK, I don't fully understand >>> what's >>> > going on there, but nice that there's apparently progress with >>> Wikidata and >>> > Wikipedia".) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> from @wikipedia: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://twitter.com/WikimediaCH/status/626066626308407296 >>> >>> >>> >> Fine by me as long as we're ok with calling it Wikipedia's medical >>> >> encyclopedia (possibly implying it's an official app?). >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I’m on the fence about these personally - has mobile weighed in on >>> these >>> >> set of apps? >>> >> >>> > You're both raising good points, but Kiwix and Wikiproject Med have a >>> good >>> > reputation in the movement for what they do, and as a default >>> assumption I >>> > would trust a major chapter to use the "Wikipedia" mark responsibly and >>> > adequately. (I'm actually working in the WMF Reading team, i.e. the >>> > engineering department responsible for mobile including the main WP >>> apps, >>> > although this RT suggestion does not constitute a papal blessing or >>> anything >>> > ;) >>> > I am more concerned about an official WMF-run Twitter account promoting >>> > Wikiwand, as it happened recently. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> from @wikicommons and perhaps others: >>> >>> https://twitter.com/benglabs/status/629966289574957056 >>> >>> https://twitter.com/Pyb75/status/629670299580125185 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> LGTM >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> LGTM from @wc and @wp - maybe @wm >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> from @mediawiki, the first one perhaps also from @wikipedia: >>> >>> https://twitter.com/brionv/status/629733830547509248 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> mayyyybe from @wikipedia, fairly technical though. @mediawiki for sure >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> https://twitter.com/brionv/status/630384030509207552 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> LGTM for @mediawiki >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> +1 for just @mw only >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> from @wikimedia and perhaps others: >>> >>> https://twitter.com/danjarratt/status/631139320997392385 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> LGTM for @wikimedia/@wikipedia/@wikicommons >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> +1 for all three >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Social-media mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Social-media mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Tilman Bayer >>> > Senior Analyst >>> > Wikimedia Foundation >>> > IRC (Freenode): HaeB >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tilman Bayer >>> Senior Analyst >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Joe Sutherland* >> Communications Intern [remote] >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: >> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> >> > > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
