Another: https://twitter.com/dajbelshaw/status/649502785688469504
On 12 September 2015 at 01:20, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote: > LGTM. This does read very well and I'd be keen to reach out - Ed, I'll > wait for your call on that! > > Joe > > On 12 September 2015 at 00:46, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From @wikimedia: >> https://twitter.com/terakasorotany/status/640233691478929409 >> >> (That's https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jagwar in case someone >> want to contact him about syndicating the post or such. Chances to >> cover Wiktionary are rare ... ) >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Gregory Varnum <[email protected] >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Responses below. >> >> >> >> -greg >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:57 AM, James Alexander < >> [email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Thoughts inline >> >> >> >> James Alexander >> >> Community Advocacy >> >> Wikimedia Foundation >> >> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> from @wikipedia and @mediawiki: >> >>> https://twitter.com/wikidata/status/631460768249200641 >> >>> >> >> No real issues from mediawiki but this one worries me a bit from >> >> @wikipedia. It just sounds a bit too technical/inside baseball. Even I >> read >> >> it and went "arbitrary access? WTF is that?" before thinking harder and >> >> realizing they mean being able to call within templates etc. I worry >> that >> >> the vast majority of our audience would have no idea what this is. >> >> >> >> >> >> Agree that it is appropriate for @mw - seems less so for @wp >> >> >> > OK, done from @mediawiki only. No strong feelings about that one, but >> just >> > as a general remark I think there is often value in (re)tweeting >> something >> > that might not be 100% accessible to all followers, but gives even >> laypeople >> > sort of an ambient sense of awareness ("OK, I don't fully understand >> what's >> > going on there, but nice that there's apparently progress with Wikidata >> and >> > Wikipedia".) >> >> >> >> >> >>> from @wikipedia: >> >>> >> >>> https://twitter.com/WikimediaCH/status/626066626308407296 >> >>> >> >> Fine by me as long as we're ok with calling it Wikipedia's medical >> >> encyclopedia (possibly implying it's an official app?). >> >> >> >> >> >> I’m on the fence about these personally - has mobile weighed in on >> these >> >> set of apps? >> >> >> > You're both raising good points, but Kiwix and Wikiproject Med have a >> good >> > reputation in the movement for what they do, and as a default >> assumption I >> > would trust a major chapter to use the "Wikipedia" mark responsibly and >> > adequately. (I'm actually working in the WMF Reading team, i.e. the >> > engineering department responsible for mobile including the main WP >> apps, >> > although this RT suggestion does not constitute a papal blessing or >> anything >> > ;) >> > I am more concerned about an official WMF-run Twitter account promoting >> > Wikiwand, as it happened recently. >> >> >> >> >> >>> from @wikicommons and perhaps others: >> >>> https://twitter.com/benglabs/status/629966289574957056 >> >>> https://twitter.com/Pyb75/status/629670299580125185 >> >> >> >> >> >> LGTM >> >> >> >> >> >> LGTM from @wc and @wp - maybe @wm >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> from @mediawiki, the first one perhaps also from @wikipedia: >> >>> https://twitter.com/brionv/status/629733830547509248 >> >> >> >> >> >> mayyyybe from @wikipedia, fairly technical though. @mediawiki for sure >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> https://twitter.com/brionv/status/630384030509207552 >> >> >> >> >> >> LGTM for @mediawiki >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 for just @mw only >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> from @wikimedia and perhaps others: >> >>> https://twitter.com/danjarratt/status/631139320997392385 >> >> >> >> >> >> LGTM for @wikimedia/@wikipedia/@wikicommons >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 for all three >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Social-media mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Social-media mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Tilman Bayer >> > Senior Analyst >> > Wikimedia Foundation >> > IRC (Freenode): HaeB >> >> >> >> -- >> Tilman Bayer >> Senior Analyst >> Wikimedia Foundation >> IRC (Freenode): HaeB >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> > > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
