Yeah, I don't know if we want to say "help us understand" in the social media post.
I prefer we lead with: "Today, we are releasing a new dataset <http://datasets.wikimedia.org/public-datasets/enwiki/etc/joined_editor_months.all.tsv.bz2> (documentation <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Monthly_wikimedia_editor_activity_dataset>) to invite community members and researchers to join us in analyzing this trend" for Fb/G On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good, though I'm not sure where the "help us understand" bit comes > in. Is that just to qualify that we don't have a cause? > > On 25 September 2015 at 18:48, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We just published "Wikipedia’s very active editor numbers have >> stabilized—delve into the data with us" to the blog. Thanks to Aaron, Neil, >> and Dario for their help with the post! >> >> Proposed social media messages: >> >> >> *Facebook/Google+/Twitter:* >> >> - The English Wikipedia's number of very active editors appears to >> have stabilized. Help us understand why. >> >> -- >> Ed Erhart >> Editorial Associate >> Wikimedia Foundation >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > -- Michael Guss Research Analyst Wikimediafoundation.org [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
