agreed with Joe, I’d rather focus on the data release angle. > On Sep 25, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Looks good, though I'm not sure where the "help us understand" bit comes in. > Is that just to qualify that we don't have a cause? > > On 25 September 2015 at 18:48, Ed Erhart <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi all, > > We just published "Wikipedia’s very active editor numbers have > stabilized—delve into the data with us" to the blog. Thanks to Aaron, Neil, > and Dario for their help with the post! > > Proposed social media messages: > > Facebook/Google+/Twitter: > The English Wikipedia's number of very active editors appears to have > stabilized. Help us understand why. > -- > Ed Erhart > Editorial Associate > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media> > > > > > -- > Joe Sutherland > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
Dario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org <http://wikimediafoundation.org/> • nitens.org <http://nitens.org/> • @readermeter <http://twitter.com/readermeter>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
