Oh damn, missed this this morning. Tomorrow or Monday?

On 9 August 2015 at 00:15, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote:

> A quick ping on this to make sure the social gets out. :-)
>
> --Ed
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That was about the gallery example, yes—no worries. :-)
>>
>> --Ed
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That could be mitigated by cropping. (I assume you are talking about
>>> the illustration for the tweet - apologies if that was about the
>>> gallery examples in WordPress instead.)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I reworded it, but to me, those images are a bit on the small side.
>>> >
>>> > --Ed
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> (BTW, as I'm re-reading that disclaimer, an offtopic remark about the
>>> >> blog post itself: I think this one works OK with just two images, but
>>> >> regarding "far more images than this platform can comfortably
>>> >> accommodate", it's worth being aware that WordPress has a gallery
>>> >> feature that can reproduce a layout such as in the Signpost original
>>> >> fairly well. See e.g.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/11/04/wikimedia-russia-tunguska-electronic-music-freely-licensed-3plet-album/
>>> >> or
>>> >>
>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/09/05/celebrating-the-10th-anniversary-of-wikimedia-commons/
>>> >> IIRC it is also documented in the blog admin documentation; if not, I
>>> >> can add a bit later.)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Joe Sutherland
>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > I think the disclaimer covers any doubts on that front anyway. I'll
>>> look
>>> >> > to
>>> >> > get this out tomorrow then, I think, for maximum reach.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Joe
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On 7 August 2015 at 23:06, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> (readding Gamaliel)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Yes, it goes a bit on the offensive, but I think that is fine in
>>> this
>>> >> >> case.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> The blog post contains two PD images which can be uploaded to
>>> Twitter
>>> >> >> without licensing concerns. I would suggest to shorten the tweet as
>>> >> >> follows so as to make room for one of them (in addition to the blog
>>> >> >> link), which as we know can help a lot to increase engagement:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous
>>> women.
>>> >> >> Wikipedia has them all. [IMAGE]
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers/
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I would tend towards choosing the painting, but both should work.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM, James Alexander
>>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> >> > Yeah, especially since we're posting from @Wikipedia I don't
>>> think
>>> >> >> > it's
>>> >> >> > needed either.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > It is a bit passive aggressive but it gets the point of the
>>> article
>>> >> >> > across
>>> >> >> > and I'm not sure it's possible to do that without being a bit
>>> either
>>> >> >> > passive
>>> >> >> > or actively aggressive ;)
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > James Alexander
>>> >> >> > Community Advocacy
>>> >> >> > Wikimedia Foundation
>>> >> >> > (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sutherland
>>> >> >> > <[email protected]>
>>> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> LGTM. I don't think it's a good idea to hashtag Wikipedia based
>>> on
>>> >> >> >> Michael's advice on searches for that term though.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> best,
>>> >> >> >> Joe
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> On 7 August 2015 at 22:51, Ed Erhart <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Hi all,
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> We just published "Wikipedia better equipped to deal with
>>> systemic
>>> >> >> >>> bias
>>> >> >> >>> than traditional publishers" to the Wikimedia blog.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Comments on the tone would be appreciated—I veered a little bit
>>> >> >> >>> into
>>> >> >> >>> passive-aggressive territory.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Twitter:
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous
>>> >> >> >>> women,
>>> >> >> >>> but
>>> >> >> >>> #Wikipedia has them all.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Facebook/G+:
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> The Basic Art series from Taschen Books is missing 100 famous
>>> >> >> >>> women,
>>> >> >> >>> but
>>> >> >> >>> #Wikipedia has them all.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> --
>>> >> >> >>> Ed Erhart
>>> >> >> >>> Editorial Intern
>>> >> >> >>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >> >> >>> Social-media mailing list
>>> >> >> >>> [email protected]
>>> >> >> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> --
>>> >> >> >> Joe Sutherland
>>> >> >> >> Communications Intern [remote]
>>> >> >> >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> >> >> Social-media mailing list
>>> >> >> >> [email protected]
>>> >> >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> >> > Social-media mailing list
>>> >> >> > [email protected]
>>> >> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> Tilman Bayer
>>> >> >> Senior Analyst
>>> >> >> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> >> >> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> >> Social-media mailing list
>>> >> >> [email protected]
>>> >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Joe Sutherland
>>> >> > Communications Intern [remote]
>>> >> > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
>>> >> >
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > Social-media mailing list
>>> >> > [email protected]
>>> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Tilman Bayer
>>> >> Senior Analyst
>>> >> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> >> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Social-media mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > --
>>> > Ed Erhart
>>> > Editorial Intern
>>> > Wikimedia Foundation
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Social-media mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tilman Bayer
>>> Senior Analyst
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Social-media mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Ed Erhart
>> Editorial Intern
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Ed Erhart
> Editorial Intern
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>
>


-- 
*Joe Sutherland*
Communications Intern [remote]
m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to