I think the disclaimer covers any doubts on that front anyway. I'll look to get this out tomorrow then, I think, for maximum reach.
Joe On 7 August 2015 at 23:06, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > (readding Gamaliel) > > Yes, it goes a bit on the offensive, but I think that is fine in this case. > > The blog post contains two PD images which can be uploaded to Twitter > without licensing concerns. I would suggest to shorten the tweet as > follows so as to make room for one of them (in addition to the blog > link), which as we know can help a lot to increase engagement: > > The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous women. > Wikipedia has them all. [IMAGE] > > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers/ > > I would tend towards choosing the painting, but both should work. > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM, James Alexander > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, especially since we're posting from @Wikipedia I don't think it's > > needed either. > > > > It is a bit passive aggressive but it gets the point of the article > across > > and I'm not sure it's possible to do that without being a bit either > passive > > or actively aggressive ;) > > > > James Alexander > > Community Advocacy > > Wikimedia Foundation > > (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sutherland < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> LGTM. I don't think it's a good idea to hashtag Wikipedia based on > >> Michael's advice on searches for that term though. > >> > >> best, > >> Joe > >> > >> On 7 August 2015 at 22:51, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> We just published "Wikipedia better equipped to deal with systemic bias > >>> than traditional publishers" to the Wikimedia blog. > >>> > >>> > >>> > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers > >>> > >>> Comments on the tone would be appreciated—I veered a little bit into > >>> passive-aggressive territory. > >>> > >>> Twitter: > >>> > >>> The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous women, > but > >>> #Wikipedia has them all. > >>> > >>> Facebook/G+: > >>> > >>> The Basic Art series from Taschen Books is missing 100 famous women, > but > >>> #Wikipedia has them all. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Ed Erhart > >>> Editorial Intern > >>> Wikimedia Foundation > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Social-media mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Joe Sutherland > >> Communications Intern [remote] > >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Social-media mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Social-media mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > > > > > -- > Tilman Bayer > Senior Analyst > Wikimedia Foundation > IRC (Freenode): HaeB > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
