That also works! Joe
On 4 August 2015 at 19:42, Dario Taraborelli <[email protected]> wrote: > https://twitter.com/WikiResearch/status/628637177321095168 > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Dario Taraborelli < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> also, in general I suggest we remove job titles to save characters – a >> name or a handle is usually enough for attribution and will save space for >> an image or a hashtag. >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Dario Taraborelli < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> nice – thanks for the pointer, I'm tweeting the link from @WikiResearch >>> >>> D >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:07 AM, James Alexander < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think I'll leave the 'what else to do' to you professionals but agree >>>> that it's awesome data and would be nice to get some more out of it. Lisa >>>> may have some ideas/ know some folks in WPFashion. I know that she has been >>>> off and on editing fashion articles and looking into the groups on wiki. >>>> >>>> Now about the social question I never have an issue opining ;) Reviews >>>> inline. Dario (copied in) may be interested in sharing from @Wikiresearch >>>> too? >>>> >>>> James Alexander >>>> Community Advocacy >>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Joe Sutherland < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> A cool, if a bit technical, blog post from data analyst Abraham >>>>> Mathew about Wikipedia statistics during Fashion Weeks. >>>>> >>>>> The original post is on Abraham Mathew's personal blog: >>>>> http://mathewanalytics.com/2015/08/03/wikipedia-and-the-fashion-weeks-a-look-at-usage-patterns/ >>>>> >>>>> It was also syndicated to popular R blog Rbloggers: >>>>> http://www.r-bloggers.com/wikipedia-and-the-fashion-weeks-a-look-at-usage-patterns/ >>>>> >>>>> Advice on which to use would be appreciated :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> At least for our main channels I'd probably lean towards the personal >>>> blog/mathewanalytics link. the r-bloggers site is definitely the 'bigger' >>>> one but I worry the layout etc will be a lot less inviting despite it being >>>> the same post. It's a relatively difficult/technical to read layout. For a >>>> more technical audience like @Wikiresearch I'd use the r-bloggers link. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Possible social (Twitter):* >>>>> • Data analyst @abmathewks looks at Wikipedia page view trends during >>>>> Fashion Week. [link] >>>>> >>>> LGTM >>>> >>>>> >>>>> *FB/G+: * >>>>> • Data analyst Abraham Mathew makes some interesting findings in >>>>> Wikipedia page view statistics during several Fashion Week events. [link] >>>>> >>>>> LGTM >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> *Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation >>> wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter >>> <http://twitter.com/readermeter> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> *Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation >> wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter >> <http://twitter.com/readermeter> >> > > > > -- > > > *Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation > wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter > <http://twitter.com/readermeter> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
