The title in this case was to prevent having to use a period in front of
his handle more than anything, but noted.

Joe

On 4 August 2015 at 19:40, Dario Taraborelli <[email protected]>
wrote:

> also, in general I suggest we remove job titles to save characters – a
> name or a handle is usually enough for attribution and will save space for
> an image or a hashtag.
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Dario Taraborelli <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> nice – thanks for the pointer, I'm tweeting the link from @WikiResearch
>>
>> D
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:07 AM, James Alexander <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think I'll leave the 'what else to do' to you professionals but agree
>>> that it's awesome data and would be nice to get some more out of it. Lisa
>>> may have some ideas/ know some folks in WPFashion. I know that she has been
>>> off and on editing fashion articles and looking into the groups on wiki.
>>>
>>> Now about the social question I never have an issue opining ;) Reviews
>>> inline. Dario (copied in) may be interested in sharing from @Wikiresearch
>>> too?
>>>
>>> James Alexander
>>> Community Advocacy
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Joe Sutherland <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A cool, if a bit technical, blog post from data analyst Abraham
>>>> Mathew about Wikipedia statistics during Fashion Weeks.
>>>>
>>>> The original post is on Abraham Mathew's personal blog:
>>>> http://mathewanalytics.com/2015/08/03/wikipedia-and-the-fashion-weeks-a-look-at-usage-patterns/
>>>>
>>>> It was also syndicated to popular R blog Rbloggers:
>>>> http://www.r-bloggers.com/wikipedia-and-the-fashion-weeks-a-look-at-usage-patterns/
>>>>
>>>> Advice on which to use would be appreciated :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> At least for our main channels I'd probably lean towards the personal
>>> blog/mathewanalytics link. the r-bloggers site is definitely the 'bigger'
>>> one but I worry the layout etc will be a lot less inviting despite it being
>>> the same post. It's a relatively difficult/technical to read layout. For a
>>> more technical audience like @Wikiresearch I'd use the r-bloggers link.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Possible social (Twitter):*
>>>> • Data analyst @abmathewks looks at Wikipedia page view trends during
>>>> Fashion Week. [link]
>>>>
>>> LGTM
>>>
>>>>
>>>> *FB/G+: *
>>>> • Data analyst Abraham Mathew makes some interesting findings in
>>>> Wikipedia page view statistics during several Fashion Week events. [link]
>>>>
>>>> LGTM
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *Dario Taraborelli  *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
>> wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter
>> <http://twitter.com/readermeter>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> *Dario Taraborelli  *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
> wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter
> <http://twitter.com/readermeter>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>
>


-- 
*Joe Sutherland*
Communications Intern [remote]
m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to