Getting a little off-topic here, but I still don't see being reckless as necessarily a bad thing. You build and learn from these sort of experiences. You're reckless once, you're reverted, you talk about it, you learn. That's to be encouraged.
Joe On 17 July 2015 at 15:05, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: > BRD is different from recklessness. Quoting: "The BOLD, revert, discuss > cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching consensus. It can sometimes > be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and > helping to break deadlocks. Care and diplomacy should be exercised. Some > editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and > patient." > > Dictionary def of "reckless" from Wiktionary: "1. Careless or heedless; > headstrong or rash. 2. > Indifferent to danger or the consequence." > > Pine > On Jul 17, 2015 12:52 PM, "Joe Sutherland" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Recklessness is very okay. See http://enwp.org/WP:BRD . >> >> Joe >> >> On 17 July 2015 at 14:50, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Encouraging boldness is ok, and new good-faith editors sometimes need >>> that encouragement. Recklessness is not ok, and this particular quote >>> sounds like it's encouaging the latter IMO. There must be a better quote >>> that can be used instead. >>> >>> Pine >>> On Jul 17, 2015 8:58 AM, "James Alexander" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, I think the context comes out ok on that. It's meant to sound >>>> revolutionary :) even if given our history perhaps it shouldn't sound like >>>> that ( because it's been a core thing since the start). >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> >>>> James Alexander >>>> Legal and Community Advocacy >>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>> +1 415-839-6885 x6716 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 10:16, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> "Be bold" is a major, MAJOR thing on Wikipedia projects however. >>>> >>>> On 17 July 2015 at 10:12, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Without broader context for that quote, I would suggest not >>>>> publicizing that widely. Wikipedia is not an anarchy. >>>>> >>>>> Pine >>>>> On Jul 17, 2015 8:01 AM, "Juliet Barbara" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think this one deserves one from wikimedia >>>>>> >>>>>> @RosieStepGood: Best sentence so far: "Be bold; break your own >>>>>> rules." @lilatretikov #Wikimania >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 9:54 AM, James Alexander < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Traditionally we've done it some. Personally I think it's a good >>>>>> thing to do especially from @Wikimedia with more limited ones from >>>>>> @Wikipedia. Is a cheap (less work then a blog etc) way to bring attention >>>>>> to the ongoing talks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> James Alexander >>>>>> Legal and Community Advocacy >>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>>>> +1 415-839-6885 x6716 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 09:47, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Should we start RTing people who are tweeting about Wikimania talks >>>>>> etc? >>>>>> >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: >>>>>> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: >>>> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Social-media mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Social-media mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Joe Sutherland* >> Communications Intern [remote] >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: >> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
