Never had an actual problem with the CMMS command. Its accepted allright (OK is returned), but does not have any effect. All users will experience its effect (or the luck of) on the next version.
The one thing I don't remember very well is if there was some other reason that I've decided to remove the CMMS from smslib. I will probably introduce a "disable-cmms" switch, just to be safe. Also, I will probably use the "2" parameter of the CMMS command, in order to give the background queues a chance to use it as well. On Aug 25, 7:43 pm, Pietro <[email protected]> wrote: > If your modem accept the command without problems, I think your > network is the problem. My provider is Telefonica, an Spain company, > very extended in Latin America where I am located. The more technical > reference stated above says CMMS is optional. I think is very > important for you to verify the results. Can you tell to some user to > check for improvements using CMMS command?. > > Pietro > > On Aug 26, 12:54 am, Thanasis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Unfortunatelly, I don't see any real improvement here. Maybe its a > > network issue or setting... > > > Anyway, I have created > > issuehttp://code.google.com/p/smslib/issues/detail?id=257 > > for the re-introduction of the CMMS command during dispatch. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SMSLib User Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
