Hello, 

Ole Holm Nielsen <ole.h.niel...@fysik.dtu.dk> writes:

> If I read Brian's comments correctly, he's saying that Slurm already has a
> well-tested and documented solution for multi-cluster sites: Federated 
> clusters.

Thanks Ole. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against using Federated
clusters, and I guess I will probably end up going for it, but my
question keeps just the same (as far as I understand nothing changes in
that respect with multi-cluster or federated setting?): whether I should
just run one slurmdbd daemon or several.

Cheers,
-- 
Ángel de Vicente
 Research Software Engineer (Supercomputing and BigData)
 Tel.: +34 922-605-747
 Web.: http://research.iac.es/proyecto/polmag/

 GPG: 0x8BDC390B69033F52

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to