Hi Mike:

I think what you've stated stands very well on its own.

I've been a "hobbyist" independent researcher since I was very young.  When
I began studying alternative and natural medicine, I was eventually shocked
to discover the state of affairs.  MOST of the alternative & natural
medicine field is nearly attrocious.  ALL the time, I run into people
marking up products and services between 500% - 2000%, charging outrageous
consulting fees, acting in a single-minded and quite unethical manner, and
then patting themselves on the back as "servants of humanity".... Charging
outrageous fortunes ( 10k - 100+k ) for therapies that don't work, and then
blaming the individual for some sort of "non-compliance", or simply
shrugging and moving on to the next case of desperation.

I think that slowly things are changing, but if you have any doubt about
what is said, try going to a natural/alt health convention one of these
days... or research how much it actually costs to produce some of these
products.

OF COURSE there is a WORLD of good out there as well.

One day, we'll have a natural highly efficient economy, and humanity will
look back at these times as times of true barbarism.

- Jason


----- Original Message -----
From: "M. G. Devour" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Colloidal silver


> Dear Sasha,
>
> I'm terribly sorry that what I wrote was so upsetting to you. Let's see
> if I can explain what I said and help you understand the context I'm
> working from ...
>
> I wrote:
> > To an extent they are correct, in that alternative medicine, as it's
> > practiced on the internet, is a chaotic zoo of conflicting claims,
> > belligerant hucksterism, fanatical debunking, and utter lunacy. If you
> > are looking for an excuse to dismiss the whole thing, you *will* be able
> > to find all the justification that you need.
>
> You responded:
> > I'm sorry, I had to read the specific paragraph of your post several
> > times to allow the shock that YOU actually wrote that sink in, and
> > take time to let the sting of your opinion wear off.  I found your one
> > particular paragraph astonishing, embarrasing, and ill-stated.  I am
> > wondering what an intelligent person such as yourself is thinking.  If
> > you are going to slam an industry with hundreds of thousands of
> > dedicated and competent people devoting their lives to it, it would be
> > most appreciated that you state "TO WHAT EXTENT" you actually do mean.
>
> I think the quickest way to get us on the same page is to ask you: How
> many people do you know who refuse to touch anything from alternative
> medicine? No matter how clear and obvious it is? No matter how
> qualified and experienced you are? How hard have you had to work to
> overcome their resistance, if you even could?
>
> And where does that resistance come from? More than anything else, I'd
> say it comes from the near-total blackout on coverage of alternative
> medicine in the corporate dominated media. Add to that the persistent
> efforts of the government to suppress other options, and most people
> who are not already interested in the subject will not *believe* that
> there are good alternatives available.
>
> They would tell you, "If any of that stuff worked my doctor would have
> told me about it!"
>
> So I consider it imperative to warn them that they're going to have to
> dig deeply enough to get past their first impressions and *find* the
> good information, the professional sounding sites, and the fair and
> detailed comparisions of their options.
>
> Notice now that I go on to write this:
>
> > What they [quackwatch] don't want you to notice, is that beneath all
> > the confusion, there are communities of people, just like this one,
> > where people gather, exchange information and reports, and communicate
> > what works and what doesn't. They gather around a particular treatment,
> > or a specific disease or condition, or sometimes just a general
> > interest in health and longevity.
> >
> > When you've settled in and made a few friends, and you've seen enough
> > reports from people just like you, who are *not* trying to sell you
> > anything, that something seems to work... Well, then it's time to look
> > a bit deeper.
>
> However ineptly it may be written, I'm trying to sketch out a strategy
> that will help them find the experts and support groups, and the honest
> companies, vendors, and therapists, that they will need in order to
> discern their best options and resist the tactics of the professional
> debunkers trying to seduce them back into the conventional fold.
>
> Imagine the poor soul just home from the Doctor's office, with their
> diagnosis in one hand and their mouse in the other. This is the first
> time they've ever tried to find health related information on the 'net.
> They type the name of their condition into Google...
>
> They *might* encounter their best option within the first 10 minutes,
> but they will end up spending days and weeks learning enough to be able
> to recognize it!
>
> And if the first dozen things they stumble across are patently
> fraudulent, or totally wacky sounding, or so poorly presented that they
> throw their hands up in disgust... they just might decide that there is
> no choice but to give up and do whatever their doctor says.
>
> So, do you think I'm underestimating the average person's motivation,
> powers of discernment, and research skills?
>
> Maybe so, but I sure have met a lot of people who won't listen to a
> word about all of this wonderful information we share out here in the
> alternative health community. Too many of them have chosen to die
> horrible and ugly deaths, rather than question their conditioning.
>
> > I come from 30 years of education, training, and experience working in
> > this field of alternative and holistic health
>
> And that's probably why you're hearing what I wrote so differently than
> what I intended to say. I'm only about 8 years into my journey from an
> ignorant and thoroughly conventional background to a good understanding
> of alternative health. I still remember what it was like to start out
> from scratch, not believing a word of it.
>
> People have it easier today, I'm sure. There are a lot more good sites
> to be found and better search technology to find them with. But I know
> from the new voices we hear all the time that it is still confusing and
> difficult to know what to believe and what to reject.
>
> > and my experience is that like anything else, there are those who are
> > quacks, hucksters, and people simply out to make a buck anyway they
> > can.
>
> Yep, we've both seen them.
>
> > ... But to say, that alternative medicine as it is practiced on the
> > internet is ". . . . "; I find very shallow, opinionated, and simply
> > creating much more harm than good.
>
> In context, all that that particular paragraph does is point out to the
> skeptical newcomer that, if they *want* to *not* believe what we tell
> them, they can easily find the justification to do so, as long as they
> don't look any further.
>
> > It does a dis-service to those who are not in the above category
>
> No, I'd say it does a well-deserved dis-service to those who *are* in
> that category.
>
> >  ... and provides an even greater loss to those who might have just
> > tried alternative means to save their lives ...
>
> Well, if a newcomer can be misled by what I wrote, then I may need to
> refine my writing skills some more. Perhaps it isn't plain enough.
>
> > ... But, because you are held in high regard, some people, not all,
> > will take your word for it.
>
> If I'm "held in high regard" it's only because of the contributions to
> this list of the many people who've shared so much knowledge and given
> so much of their time and energy to helping other people.
>
> > CS is not the only possibility for health and wellness.
>
> And you will never hear me say anything of the kind.
>
> Sasha, I hope you'll find it in yourself to forgive me for the insult
> you feel I've given you. It was never my intent.
>
> Be well,
>
> Mike Devour
> silver-list owner
>
> [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
> [[email protected]                        ]
> [Speaking only for myself...               ]
>
>
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
> OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>
>