What??? My Jedi mind tricks aren't working?!?!?! Horrors! I'll have to do better... :-) Hey, I'm playing with words here. No argument that if some idiot takes a bunch of radioactive material and puts it in the middle of a populated area in a leaky containment vessel and/or lets it leak out into the neighborhood, it is going to do a lot of harm. My suggestion would be: don't do that.
Dick ________________________________ From: bodhisattva <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 11:13:33 AM Subject: Re: CS>A closer look at americium 241 from a smoke detector Actually, you could make an argument that by mining radioactive substances and concentrating them into reactors, bombs, or other "products", you are making the world a bit safer, since it is easier to avoid exposure to reactors, bombs, etc, than to the same substances all spread out in the ground. No you can't, there would be no logical, physical, or spiritual basis to substantiate such a ludicrous claim. Can I inquire as to who you work for? For the kindergarten types, you are comparing "Natural Dispersion" with "Un-Natural Concentration". Your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me. :-P Seriously, most people don't understand the ramifications of all of this. I consider myself "Sensitive" to energies, that is, I can feel them. It's nothing unique to me, I simply have tuned into my higher self and the world around me a little bit more than others.. It's handy, for example I can walk into a home and tell if the main is properly grounded. Or I can find shorts in light switches by walking past them. It also comes in handy to help people, for example I walked into a relatives home and said "You have something on fire in here.". Everyone looked at me like I was retarded, so I followed my nose, and came upon a cheap Walmart lamp in the living room. My father in-law was sitting 10 inches from him, I asked him to move a minute, and pointed out the lamp had a short. After we removed the shade, you could see the burn marks. It's not magic, it's just about not being chemically, electronically, and spiritually dumbed down, which is exactly what they want you to be - dumb and insensitive. A guy sitting 10 inches from an electrical fire can't even smell it? That's not good for survival, you know? Now, the reason for making this point.. My wife and I were driving on the highway during some travels. At one point I said "Wow, really horrid energy around here. The energy of death, a lot of really nasty stuff concentrated.".. We looked around a bit, and found a Nuclear Reactor not far from that location. Coincidence? Hardly. These things concentrate energy on a subtle level, some of it mainstream science won't publically acknowledge, and this energy is not beneficial to human existence. Wilhelm Reich would call the nasty shit coming off this reactor "DOR". I later researched this reactor, and found that ever since it went online, the disease rates went through the roof of the people living in county around it. "Science" tells us nothing is coming off it, they can't find anything in their tests. But here we are.... This kind of garbage belongs in the groun http://michiganmessenger.com/12965/cancer-questions-grow-around-fermi-nuclear-plant Cancer questions grow around Fermi nuclear plant State health report shows 31 percent increase in cancer rate among young people in Monroe County since 1996 Richard Goodwin wrote: > >If a radioactive substance is moved from one place, e.g. in the >ground, to another place, e.g., in a smoke detector, how is that >"adding" to it? > >>All the radioactive matter on earth is somewhere right now. When we >use it, we move it from wherever it is to some place else. We don't >create it. > >>Actually, you could make an argument that by mining radioactive >substances and concentrating them into reactors, bombs, or other >"products", you are making the world a bit safer, since it is easier to >avoid exposure to reactors, bombs, etc, than to the same substances all >spread out in the ground. > >>I never have understood quite why people get all wrapped around the >axle about some things. For example, we take aluminum out of the >ground, where it is one of the more abundant elements in the earth's >crust, and we make beer cans out of it. But if we then put that >aluminum back in the ground, e.g., by throwing empty beer cans into the >dump, people get all in a lather about pollution. Why? We are just >putting the aluminum back where we found it. > >>And "wasting water". People get all wound up about using too much >water. But it's not like it gets used up. It's still there after >whatever we use it for. And it comes back to us from rain, etc. Why >all the furor? > >>Yeah, I know, there can be local shortages, but overall the total >amount of water on earth doesn't really change, does it? > >>Dick > > > > ________________________________ From: Bob >Banever <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Thu, April 22, >2010 8:58:34 PM >Subject: Re: CS>A >closer look at americium 241 from a smoke detector > > >Alan, > > Yes of course. Best not to add >to it. I'm sure you would agree. > > Cheers. >----- >>Original Message ----- >>From: Alan Jones >>To: [email protected] >>Sent: >>Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:37 PM >>Subject: >>Re: CS>A closer look at americium 241 from a smoke detector >> >> >>Better go live in a lead box, even the natural world is full of it. >> >> >> >> >>On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Bob >>Banever <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>No amount of radiation is trivial. No level is >>>safe and all ionizing radiation causes damage to DNA. >>> >> >>-- >>>>Alan Jones >>
