/Actually, you could make an argument that by mining radioactive
substances and concentrating them into reactors, bombs, or other
"products", you are making the world a bit safer, since it is easier to
avoid exposure to reactors, bombs, etc, than to the same substances all
spread out in the ground./
No you can't, there would be no logical, physical, or spiritual basis to
substantiate such a ludicrous claim. Can I inquire as to who you work
for? For the kindergarten types, you are comparing "Natural Dispersion"
with "Un-Natural Concentration". Your Jedi mind tricks don't work on
me. :-P
Seriously, most people don't understand the ramifications of all of
this. I consider myself "Sensitive" to energies, that is, I can feel
them. It's nothing unique to me, I simply have tuned into my higher
self and the world around me a little bit more than others.. It's handy,
for example I can walk into a home and tell if the main is properly
grounded. Or I can find shorts in light switches by walking past them.
It also comes in handy to help people, for example I walked into a
relatives home and said "You have something on fire in here.". Everyone
looked at me like I was retarded, so I followed my nose, and came upon a
cheap Walmart lamp in the living room. My father in-law was sitting 10
inches from him, I asked him to move a minute, and pointed out the lamp
had a short. After we removed the shade, you could see the burn marks.
It's not magic, it's just about not being chemically, electronically,
and spiritually dumbed down, which is exactly what they want you to be -
dumb and insensitive. A guy sitting 10 inches from an electrical fire
can't even smell it? That's not good for survival, you know?
Now, the reason for making this point.. My wife and I were driving on
the highway during some travels. At one point I said "Wow, really horrid
energy around here. The energy of death, a lot of really nasty stuff
concentrated.".. We looked around a bit, and found a Nuclear Reactor not
far from that location. Coincidence? Hardly. These things concentrate
energy on a subtle level, some of it mainstream science won't publically
acknowledge, and this energy is not beneficial to human existence.
Wilhelm Reich would call the nasty shit coming off this reactor "DOR".
I later researched this reactor, and found that ever since it went
online, the disease rates went through the roof of the people living in
county around it. "Science" tells us nothing is coming off it, they
can't find anything in their tests. But here we are.... This kind of
garbage belongs in the groun
http://michiganmessenger.com/12965/cancer-questions-grow-around-fermi-nuclear-plant
Cancer questions grow around Fermi nuclear plant
State health report shows 31 percent increase in cancer rate among young
people in Monroe County since 1996
Richard Goodwin wrote:
If a radioactive substance is moved from one place, e.g. in the
ground, to another place, e.g., in a smoke detector, how is that
"adding" to it?
All the radioactive matter on earth is somewhere right now. When we
use it, we move it from wherever it is to some place else. We don't
create it.
Actually, you could make an argument that by mining radioactive
substances and concentrating them into reactors, bombs, or other
"products", you are making the world a bit safer, since it is easier
to avoid exposure to reactors, bombs, etc, than to the same substances
all spread out in the ground.
I never have understood quite why people get all wrapped around the
axle about some things. For example, we take aluminum out of the
ground, where it is one of the more abundant elements in the earth's
crust, and we make beer cans out of it. But if we then put that
aluminum back in the ground, e.g., by throwing empty beer cans into
the dump, people get all in a lather about pollution. Why? We are
just putting the aluminum back where we found it.
And "wasting water". People get all wound up about using too much
water. But it's not like it gets used up. It's still there after
whatever we use it for. And it comes back to us from rain, etc. Why
all the furor?
Yeah, I know, there can be local shortages, but overall the total
amount of water on earth doesn't really change, does it?
Dick
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Bob Banever <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Thu, April 22, 2010 8:58:34 PM
*Subject:* Re: CS>A closer look at americium 241 from a smoke detector
Alan,
Yes of course. Best not to add to it. I'm sure you would agree.
Cheers.
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Alan Jones <mailto:[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: CS>A closer look at americium 241 from a smoke detector
Better go live in a lead box, even the natural world is full of it.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Bob Banever
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
No amount of radiation is trivial. No level is safe and all
ionizing radiation causes damage to DNA.
--
Alan Jones
