On 10/31/07, Charles Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shrug. Wikipedia isn't perfect, the criticisms are valid, but... so what?
Good question. I just have this vague unease that it's becoming a _de facto_ reference, and wanted to spend some cycles in clarifying my own misgivings about it. > > Just another datum to add to the mix - the _current_ incarnation of > > the Wikipedia entry for EDGE [3] is more comprehensive than the > > gsmworld one. :-\ > > And yet you decline to cite it, even by version (to avoid possible > future bad edits?) Why? See my response above. And I ended up citing it anyway - and by version, too. :-\ Udhay -- ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
