On 10/31/07, Udhay Shankar N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I posted the link above, as I'm trying to wean myself from posting > Wikipedia links - I've come to have misgivings about how easily it > can be gamed (indeed, how it games itself) - [1] is an example, I > personally know of more.
>From [1]'s blog "The Wikipedia situation is now sorted..." http://sammymorse.livejournal.com/34306.html > A great summary of all of the pluses and minuses of Wikipedia can be > found in the discussion here [2]. Cory, want to add anything to your > thought-provoking argument *for* Wikipedia on Making Light? > > I thought I'd ask the hivemind here for their thoughts, pro and con. Shrug. Wikipedia isn't perfect, the criticisms are valid, but... so what? > Just another datum to add to the mix - the _current_ incarnation of > the Wikipedia entry for EDGE [3] is more comprehensive than the > gsmworld one. :-\ And yet you decline to cite it, even by version (to avoid possible future bad edits?) Why? -- Charles
