At 2007-05-23 17:46:06 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Pretty sure of that. Even though it didn't have any visible antennae, > legs or wings.
Got any pictures of its (doubtless seedy) underbelly? -- ams
At 2007-05-23 17:46:06 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Pretty sure of that. Even though it didn't have any visible antennae, > legs or wings.
Got any pictures of its (doubtless seedy) underbelly? -- ams