On 1/27/06, Frank Pohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incidentally, I do not trust genetic evidence as > evidence of migration. Genetic evidence usually > corrorobates migration, but rarely says much about > date or meaning or the very extent of the migration > concerned. You can say it occured once markers are > found, but then it becomes a little more difficult, > unless full genetic surveys are done.
For a couple of years now I have been contemplating taking a genetic deep ancestry test[1] just for the heck of it. There are many in my family who take pride in their supposed "aryan" descent from "europe" (i.e. Central Asia as we have already discussed in this thread) and how our Brahmin blood is uncontaminated. Just out of curiosity, I would like to see to what extent my ancestors were busy diluting their "Aryan" purity. I am still looking for a good non-US-or-european focusses test. Eugen, any ideas on this, *chortle*, Eugen-ic topic? ;-) Thaths [1] Like the one at https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/participate.html?fs=www3.nationalgeographic.com -- "Bart! With $10,000 we'd be millionaires! We could buy all kinds of useful things... like love." -- Homer J. Simpson
