Marco Schmidt <marco.schm...@gmail.com> writes: > I was a bit confused about the many repos I found: > > 1. darcs > 2. gitlab > 3. sourceforge > 4. rpm repo (actully I never saw this)
There's no code repo currently at SF, basically just downloads, as I haven't had time to sort it out. The rpm one (documented somewhere) is just for Fedora/EPEL package installation. gitlab mirrors https://arc.liv.ac.uk/repos/git/* as it says. > At one point we decided to take the Darcs Repo as the master and we made > an EXACT copy of the Darcs Repo, without losing anything. We proofed > this by using "diff". If you want a git repo, why not use the existing one? > The Darcs-Git clone shows errors on "git fsck", because Git is > complaining about missing email-addresses of authors. I don't know why that's a problem -- I'm not aware of one. If you modified changes, I assume they're now incompatible. > This is why I decided to use "darcs-to-git" I've never heard of that. > I have no idea how the issues and other things could be migrated to > gitlab. I would love to keep the history ! Yes, and there's more than (multiple) source repos. I went to considerable trouble to save stuff from sunsource, and still didn't get a proper complete history of issues (including closed ones). > From my point of view it was important to save the source in case > Liverpool shuts down the "Trac". I hope they wouldn't do that without telling me, though it's now somewhat broken. I found by chance I can currently push changes there, and have done a largely-untested batch, but the hook for updating issues etc. painfully regenerates the history each time, and is failing to update issues, at least. _______________________________________________ SGE-discuss mailing list SGE-discuss@liv.ac.uk https://arc.liv.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/sge-discuss
