Yeah, and I'd like to ease the release process which is a real pain. See http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/release-guide.html Maven should be able to do all that in one command line but there are some bugs and limitations unfortunately :-{
On 6/25/07, Gert Vanthienen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guillaume, Looks fine to me! We should definitely be able to create something to automate this kind of administrative tasks in the future... Gert Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations > and redeployed a release to the same staging area. > Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations > (I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major > release and fix the generated license files somehow. > > Could everyone quickly review the changes ? > I won't start a new vote as only the LICENSE file has > changed, but I can if someone objects. > > robert burrell donkin wrote: >> On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> robert burrell donkin wrote: >>>> On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ... >>>> issues >>>> ------- >>>> >>>> i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some >>>> libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg >>>> howl, jencks) >>> There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik. >> cool >> >>> Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My >>> assumption >>> was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a >>> different license >>> need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong. >> it is safe to release without listing them (and if this were the only >> issue then i would probably have voted affirmatively) >> >> but the aim should be to allow people to understand the licensing of >> releases without need to ask questions or do research. if i don't >> understand the licensing then i will ask. so, it's a good idea to note >> the licenses for all jars since it avoids the need to answer questions >> like this... >> >> <snip> >> >>>> otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions >>>> >>>> source in >>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/ >>> >>>> lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these >>>> generated? >>>> >>>> are the jars under >>>> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going to >>>> be released? >>>> >>>> servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java >>>> sources without headers (mostly under >>>> org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if so, >>>> are these generated? >>> Yeah, lots of these files are generated. Files generated are not in svn >>> so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source >>> jars generated by maven. These jars are not meant to be built for only >>> contain all the java sources for debugging purposes. If you want to >>> build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the svn >>> tag. >> fine >> >> i hope to be a bit more prompt with the review next time >> >> - robert >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
