Guillaume,
Looks fine to me! We should definitely be able to create something to
automate this kind of administrative tasks in the future...
Gert
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations
and redeployed a release to the same staging area.
Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations
(I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major
release and fix the generated license files somehow.
Could everyone quickly review the changes ?
I won't start a new vote as only the LICENSE file has
changed, but I can if someone objects.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ...
issues
-------
i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some
libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg
howl, jencks)
There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik.
cool
Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My
assumption
was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a
different license
need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong.
it is safe to release without listing them (and if this were the only
issue then i would probably have voted affirmatively)
but the aim should be to allow people to understand the licensing of
releases without need to ask questions or do research. if i don't
understand the licensing then i will ask. so, it's a good idea to note
the licenses for all jars since it avoids the need to answer questions
like this...
<snip>
otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions
source in
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/
lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these
generated?
are the jars under
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going to
be released?
servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java
sources without headers (mostly under
org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if so,
are these generated?
Yeah, lots of these files are generated. Files generated are not in svn
so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source
jars generated by maven. These jars are not meant to be built for only
contain all the java sources for debugging purposes. If you want to
build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the svn
tag.
fine
i hope to be a bit more prompt with the review next time
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]