On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:23:30 GMT, Chris Plummer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> SA should follow HotSpot implementation, so that code should be included >> basically. However it is not needed in this case. Thus I left comment the >> reason. > > I still don't follow. Are you saying that map->in_cont() will always return > true so you don't need the walk_cont related code? I just want to say we don't need to copy `return map->stack_chunk()->sender(*this, map)` to SA from HotSpot because `map->in_cont()` should be `false` in use case of SA. `in_cont()` returns `true` if `_chunk` is not `NULL`, but it would not happen in the use case of SA because `RegisterMap` would not be initialized with `WalkContinuation::include`. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30107#discussion_r2908516241
