On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 09:11:06 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This looks okay. However, I agree with David it is not going to address the
> issue with static analysis tool. Is it right? Also, why are there two bugs
> associated with this PR?
Because there are two identical analyzer detections in similar code
sections of this file. I created one ticket for each detection. However, I
fixed both issues with a single PR.
Regarding the analyzer, we will rerun the analysis with assert enabled and
check if it helps to suppress the analyzer warnings
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26002#issuecomment-3022949352
