On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 14:04:51 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo 
<pchilanom...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Ok, for now. We should try to come up with a better split.
>
> If there are sample requests then we are already in the slow path so loading 
> again `has_cpu_time_jfr_requests()` later won't change anything. My 
> suggestion would be to avoid passing this boolean around.

I removed it.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25302#discussion_r2126751794

Reply via email to