On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:15:18 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Another way to phrase this is perhaps: "why don't we need iconv on linux?" > > I googled this and can answer it myself: because `iconv()` is built into > glibc. Yes, that's what I came to as well. Sorry I didn't include that info in the original description. It seems to be even more complicated on some platforms, where there _is_ built in support for iconv (or a system supplied libiconv), but with limitations so that you may want to prefer the GNU libiconv in any case. I think we should be able to configure these cases properly also with the proposed changes. I'll update the PR as outlined in the previous comments. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23995#issuecomment-2717713872
