On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:52:19 GMT, Dean Long <dl...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > Overall the changes seem fine, however it would be nice if the > > > vmStructs.cpp registration mechanism was modular and extensible, instead > > > of monolithic. That would make it easier to register private types, or > > > even types outside of libjvm. > > > > > > I'm not too sure what you are suggesting here. > > For example, instead of a single table, allow multiple tables. They could be > registered with with an API similar to JNI RegisterNatives. I don't see how that relates to this change. It sounds more like a general suggestion to overhaul of how vmStructs is implemented. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23279#issuecomment-2613584454
