On 2025-01-20 20:36, some-java-user-99206970363698485...@vodafonemail.de
wrote:
Thanks for the information! Though I cannot see the report. Is it
still pending review / evaluation or was it made private to hide
information? Is it still open or was it resolved as "Won't fix" or
similar?
Yes, the bug is marked confidential. I didn't notice it right away.
It is open.
It seems I wasn't informed that the report had been created; at least
I cannot find the confirmation mail for it. Note that I had specified
a different private contact e-mail address.
It's because the bug isn't public.
Note: I am dropping serviceability-dev@openjdk.org from CC now. I had
originally included it because I thought it might have been better
fitting for this mail, but I didn't get a confirmation mail for the
list subscription, so I wasn't sure whether the mail would go through.
This discussion belongs on serviceability-dev@openjdk.org. It's
disc...@openjdk.org that should be dropped.
20.01.2025, 21:16 Aleksei Ivanov:
Hello,
Your bug report exists in JBS:
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329414
On 2025-01-20 20:07,
some-java-user-99206970363698485...@vodafonemail.de wrote:
Side note: I am rather certain I had also reported this on the JDK
bug tracker through https://bugreport.java.com quite a while ago
(unless I am misremembering this) also referring to the IDEA bug
report IDEA-349570 in the description, but it seems the JDK bug
report was never created and I never got a response (?). See also my
general concerns with the current bug reporting in
https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/web-discuss/2022-January/000593.html.
--
Regards,
Alexey
