On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 02:39:24 GMT, SendaoYan <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> To make less CI noisy, before the root cause of 
> [JDK-8343244](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343244) has fixed, should 
> we problemlist the failure tests, include AttachTest.java and 
> TestZPageAllocationEvent.java

Thanks.

test/jdk/ProblemList.txt line 779:

> 777: java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id0    8343244 
> linux-aarch64,linux-ppc64le
> 778: java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id1    8343244 
> linux-aarch64,linux-ppc64le
> 779: jdk/jfr/event/gc/detailed/TestZPageAllocationEvent.java         8343244 
> linux-aarch64,linux-ppc64le

@sendaoYan  we have also seen these crashes on x64, so I think it just needs to 
be linux-all

test/jdk/ProblemList.txt line 779:

> 777: java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id0    8343244 
> linux-aarch64,linux-ppc64le
> 778: java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id1    8343244 
> linux-aarch64,linux-ppc64le
> 779: jdk/jfr/event/gc/detailed/TestZPageAllocationEvent.java         8343244 
> linux-aarch64,linux-ppc64le

Also IIUC the JFR test only failed with non-generational ZGC which has now been 
removed.

-------------

Changes requested by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21917#pullrequestreview-2417385525
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21917#discussion_r1830476631
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21917#discussion_r1830478623

Reply via email to