On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:38:10 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <hon...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> test/jdk/javax/imageio/CachePremissionsTest/CachePermissionsTest.java line
>> 76:
>>
>>> 74: System.out.println("java.io.tmpdir is " +
>>> System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir"));
>>> 75:
>>> 76: if (args.length > 1) {
>>
>> The isFileCacheExpected logic does not make sense. The test sets set to use
>> the cache but then reads whether to expect it based on the args[0]. If that
>> were set to false the test will fail. So why is it there ?
>>
>> Also the messing around with exceptions at the end of the test is pointless
>
> @prrace I might have missed removing this check which was in the original
> test. The latest update to this test has two run tags but it fails when
> isFileCacheExpected is set to true.
>
> Did you mean to keep only one run tag?
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk-sandbox/commit/1bf77a393c5756bca65760402077617d37be72d2
>
> I'll be rename the test as suggested when I update this test next.
No changes required for this test. The test was failing due to IDE config issue
of tmp dir.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21498#discussion_r1813474346
