On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:37:50 GMT, Axel Boldt-Christmas <abold...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is a really good suggestion and might help a lot with the performance >> problems that we see with the table with heavily contended locking. I think >> we should change this in a follow-on patch (which I'll work on). > > I inlined the table in the surrounding object as it is a trivial change. > > Removing both indirections and creating static storage I would require more > work (some conditional deferred creation, similar to an optional). Sadly doesn't help with performance. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20067#discussion_r1715443138
