On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 09:04:24 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Can I please get a review of this test-only change which proposes to fix the 
>> test timeout reported in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334167?
>> 
>> The JBS issue has comments which explains what causes the timeout. The 
>> commit in this PR addresses those issues by updating the test specific 
>> `ClassFileTransformer` to only instrument application specific class instead 
>> of all (core) classes. The test was introduced several years back to verify 
>> the feature introduced in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6263319. As 
>> such, the proposed changes in this PR continue to test that feature - we now 
>> merely use application specific class' native method to verify the semantics 
>> of that feature.
>> 
>> Additional cleanups have been done in the test to make sure that if any 
>> exception does occur in the ClassFileTransformer then it does get recorded 
>> and that then causes the test to fail.
>> 
>> With this change, I have run tier1 through tier6 and the test passes. 
>> Additionally, without this change I've run the test with a test repeat of 
>> 100 with virtual threads enabled and the test hangs occasionally (as 
>> expected). With this proposed fix, I have then run the test with virtual 
>> threads, around 300 times and it hasn't failed or hung in any of those 
>> instances.
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   better formatting for transform() method of the test's agent

Okay. Still seems to be a lot more changes than needed for the key update, but 
so be it.

Thanks

test/jdk/java/lang/instrument/NativeMethodPrefixApp.java line 50:

> 48:     // It assumes that a specific non-native library method will call a 
> specific
> 49:     // native method.  The below may need to be updated based on library 
> changes.
> 50:     static String goldenNativeMethodName = "fooBarNativeMethod";

The comment block above seems no longer applicable now this is not a library 
class method.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20154#pullrequestreview-2177321848
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20154#discussion_r1677591632

Reply via email to