On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:41:21 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Thanks, I'm already working on it. > > Fixed as suggested by Alan. > >> Also need to think through if Object.wait will need to be changed as part of >> this. > > Still need to look at this. Use of `ObjectLocker` here will introduce a new pinning point for Loom. We have been removing as many uses of `ObjectLocker` as we can. I also think this will need to be moved back to Java code when the pinning currently inherent in calling `Object.wait` is addressed. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18093#discussion_r1515622346
