On Sat, 27 May 2023 20:21:46 GMT, Leonid Mesnik <lmes...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Disable test
> java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/OOMEInAQS.java
> Test provokes OOME and might catch it in an unexpected location. It looks 
> like an issue similar to https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298066. 
> However, generally the OOME might be thrown mount/umount or in unparker 
> thread. There are no plans to fix such tests to be able to pass with virtual 
> threads now. 
> 
> Also, disable
> mTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/allocation/AP04/ap04t001/TestDescription.java
> vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/allocation/AP04/ap04t002/TestDescription.java
> because of https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8308985

test/jdk/ProblemList-Virtual.txt line 75:

> 73: java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyNestedResolutionTest.java 0000000 generic-all
> 74: java/lang/ref/OOMEInReferenceHandler.java 0000000 generic-all
> 75: java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/OOMEInAQS.java 0000000 generic-all

The comment a bit further to see where it explains why this section uses 
"0000000" for the JBS issue. There's a few typos in the text, e.g. "with with" 
and "test migth". It might be useful to make that text a bit clearer as I'm 
sure there will be questions on why there aren't JBS issues for tests excluded 
from running this mode.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14193#discussion_r1208346103

Reply via email to