On Fri, 5 May 2023 23:03:38 GMT, Alex Menkov <amen...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The fix updates JVMTI FollowReferences implementation to report references 
>> from virtual threads:
>> - unmounted vthreads are detected, their stack references for 
>> JVMTI_HEAP_REFERENCE_STACK_LOCAL/JVMTI_HEAP_REFERENCE_JNI_LOCAL;
>> - stacks of mounted vthreads are splitted into 2 parts (virtual thread stack 
>> and carrier thread stack), references are reported with correct thread 
>> id/class tag/object tags/frame depth;
>> - common code to handle stack frames are moved into separate class;
>> 
>> Threads are reported as:
>> - platform threads: JVMTI_HEAP_REFERENCE_THREAD (as before);
>> - mounted vthreads (synthetic references, consider them as heap roots 
>> because carrier threads are roots): JVMTI_HEAP_REFERENCE_OTHER;
>> - unmounted vthreads: not reported as heap roots.
>
> Alex Menkov has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - cosmetic changes in libVThreadStackRefTest.cpp
>  - collect VT stack references if initial_object is null
>  - moved transition disabler to correct functions

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/FollowReferences/libVThreadStackRefTest.cpp
 line 140:

> 138:     LOG("JVMTI FollowReferences error: %d\n", err);
> 139:     env->FatalError("FollowReferences failed");
> 140:   }

Nit: `classesCount` and `heapCallBacks` need c-style names.

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/FollowReferences/libVThreadStackRefTest.cpp
 line 153:

> 151: }
> 152: 
> 153: static void printCreatedClass(JNIEnv* env, jclass cls) {

Nit: This function should have a c-style name.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13254#discussion_r1186668539
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13254#discussion_r1186668689

Reply via email to