On Wed, 3 May 2023 04:13:32 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I feel that it is a feature in the spec to say differently in specific case >> vs common case. >> It should help to understand each case better. >> In this particular case, it can be useful to align wording with "the current >> frame". > > I can see that reasoning for "unable to throw an asynchronous exception" and > "cannot be performed", but what about "the implementation" vs "the function". > Can't they both be the same? I was thinking about the same. The problem is the spec has several variations for it: - function, operation, implementation... It is hard or impossible to make this completely consistent. But I have a doubt it is very important to polish it like this. The spec might be boring to read if it is fully consistent. :) ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13546#discussion_r1183229181
