On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 23:13:36 GMT, Alex Menkov <amen...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> In that case is it worth listing the "no vtable" classes that have a >> superclass? Are they somehow more interesting than those without a >> superclass? > > If superclass is set then it's the type which describes VM class (but some JM > classes have super == null) > Maybe the test should report all Types with CInt: false, CStr: false, > JPrimitive: false, Oop: false, Ptr: false > Looks like these entries correspond declare_toplevel_type/declare_type in > vmStruct Updated criteria to log classes without vtable ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12820
