On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:22:01 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Improve link target per code review comments.
>
> src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/remote/JMXConnectorFactory.java
>  line 140:
> 
>> 138:  * implementation may choose to find providers by other means.  For
>> 139:  * example, it may support {@linkplain
>> 140:  * java.base/java.util.ServiceLoader##developing-service-providers 
>> service providers},
> 
> is `java.base/` needed here? I am a bit surprised - it's first time I see a 
> module name used in a regular link target.

Updated.

> src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/remote/JMXConnectorServerFactory.java
>  line 129:
> 
>> 127:  * <code>MalformedURLException</code> if there is none.  An
>> 128:  * implementation may choose to find providers by other means.  For
>> 129:  * example, it may support {@linkplain
> 
> Same remark regarding `java.base/` prefix.

For the connector server factory, "java.util" is still needed in the link since 
I didn't want to change the import statements of the class.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12058

Reply via email to