On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:12:50 GMT, Vicente Romero <vrom...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Yes... I did it that way is so that it doesn't require any adaptation 
>> if/when JDK-8194743 ever gets implemented. And it keeps the code a little 
>> simpler in exchange for a little redundancy.
>> 
>> I'm happy to fix this if you think it is necessary though.
>
> I'm OK either way we can revisit this later either as part of this PR or in a 
> future one. I let it to your consideration

Sounds good - thanks.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11874

Reply via email to