On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 06:23:25 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Yeah that isn't nice. I was thinking a more simple check of the property > value against the required number of threads. Though based on your comment > "nthreads+1" is not always enough so the check would not be sufficient. I think I can get past the nthreads + 1 issue. I believe in one test there is another vthread that I was not accounting for, so probably nthreads + 2 would work for that test. However, I don't quite understand your suggestion. Are you suggesting that after checking the property, if too small then I don't run the test and just have it pass? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11735
