On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 05:19:08 GMT, Ioi Lam <ik...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> src/hotspot/os/posix/perfMemory_posix.cpp line 796: >> >>> 794: if (!is_locked_by_another_process) { >>> 795: if ((pid == os::current_process_id()) || >>> 796: (kill(pid, 0) == OS_ERR && (errno == ESRCH || errno == >>> EPERM))) { >> >> Thinking about this, I now was confused. AFAICS this code is only ever >> called from `mmap_create_shared` with the directory containing our own pid. >> I do not see this called for PIDs from other processes. Why do we handle >> that case? Or am I overlooking something? > > The current JVM process only cleans up stale files in the current user's own > directory. I.e., /tmp/hsperfdata_bob/. However, when we see a file like > /tmp/hsperfdata_bob/1234, it's possible that > > - 1234 was a JVM process created by bob, but this process died without > cleaning up > - A new process 1234 is now running, but it belongs to a different user, john > > So if `kill(1234, 0)` fails, the JVM concludes that, > "/tmp/hsperfdata_bob/1234 must belong to a terminated JVM process owned by > bob". > > I think this is the intention of the code, in spite of what the comment says > above the `kill` call.
I simplified the code and restructured the comments to be interspersed with the code. Hopefully that would make the logic a little easier to understand. Despite the large diff in cleanup_sharedmem_files(), the only actual change is to `flock` in the middle of the loop, and avoid deleting the file if the `flock` fails. I removed this comment // ... are removed because the resources for such a // process should be in a different user specific directory. and replaced it with something more comprehensive which hopefully makes more sense: // This directory should be used only by JVM processes owned by the // current user to store PerfMemory files. Any other files found // in this directory may be removed. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9406