On Fri, 4 Sep 2026 13:29:27 GMT, Andreas Chmielewski <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>> I see. Then checking the TLS version makes sense here. However, if this is 
>> TLS 1.2 specific, it should be under an algorithm with the version info, 
>> e.g. "SunTlsExtendedMasterSecret" vs  "SunTls12ExtendedMasterSecret"? Maybe 
>> it's time to update JSSE side to separate the usage into different 
>> algorithms?
>
> Hi @valeriepeng,
> 
> To make sure I understand your suggestion correctly, would the following 
> approach address your concern?
> 
> 1. For TLS 1.2, _SunJSSE_ uses `KeyGenerator.SunTls12ExtendedMasterSecret` 
> instead of `KeyGenerator.SunTlsExtendedMasterSecret`.
> 2. For SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0, and TLS 1.1, _SunJSSE_ continues to use 
> `KeyGenerator.SunTlsExtendedMasterSecret`.
> 3. _SunJCE_ adds `SunTls12ExtendedMasterSecret` as another alias of 
> `KeyGenerator.SunTlsMasterSecret` (the current aliases are 
> `SunTls12MasterSecret` and `SunTlsExtendedMasterSecret`).
> 4. _SunPKCS11_ only implements `SunTls12ExtendedMasterSecret` (this is 
> already part of the current patch).
> 
> The corresponding SunJCE change would look like:
> 
> 
> diff --git a/src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/SunJCE.java 
> b/src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/SunJCE.java
> index 4b38bd55809..c9e7191df33 100644
> --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/SunJCE.java
> +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/SunJCE.java
> @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ void putEntries() {
> 
>          ps("KeyGenerator", "SunTlsMasterSecret",
>                  "com.sun.crypto.provider.TlsMasterSecretGenerator",
> -                List.of("SunTls12MasterSecret", 
> "SunTlsExtendedMasterSecret"),
> +                List.of("SunTls12MasterSecret", 
> "SunTlsExtendedMasterSecret", "SunTls12ExtendedMasterSecret"),
>                  null);
> 
>          ps("KeyGenerator", "SunTlsKeyMaterial",
> 
> 
> Is this along the lines of what you had in mind?

Yes, that is right. What do you think?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32081#discussion_r3965397884

Reply via email to