> This fix allows for more accurate comparisons between intrinsics and Java > performance for P256 conditional set operations. > Before this fix, benchmarks showed a 53% regression for intrinsics vs. Java > due to constant propagation and dead-code removal by C2. After this fix, > only a 8% drop in performance is observed for intrinsics vs. Java. > > --------- > - [X] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
Shawn Emery has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Update based on Vladimir's comments ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32047/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32047/files/550f060d..e9ab6be9 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=32047&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=32047&range=00-01 Stats: 31 lines in 1 file changed: 13 ins; 7 del; 11 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32047.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/32047/head:pull/32047 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32047
