On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 20:15:30 GMT, Shawn Emery <[email protected]> wrote:

> Curve25519 polynomial arithmetic is performed with intrinsincs implemented in 
> GPR related instructions for multiplication operations (method mult()). 
> Benchmark improvements include:
> 
> X25519 decapsulation: +9%
> X25519 encapsulation: +9%
> X22519 key agreement: +7%
> X25519 key-pair generation: +10%
> X25519-MLKEM decapsulation: +7%
> X25519-MLKEM encapsulation: +8%
> X25519-MLKEM key-pair generation: +8%
> EdDSA sign: +12%
> EdDSA verify: +12%
> EdDSA key-pair generation: +15%
> 
> Note 1: The difference between Aarch64 vs. x86_64 intrinsics implementation 
> include the lack of square() intrinsics; usage caused a 3.3% performance 
> regression due to the efficiencies of the symmetric squaring shape in Java 
> vs. the inefficiencies of the leaf calls and the additional cycles required 
> for 64 bit multiplication in Aarch64.
> Note 2: The GPR related instructions were optimal when compared to hybrid 
> (GPR related instructions for the first two iterations and Neon instructions 
> for the last two iterations) solution.  This design produced a -4%/-1% 
> performance drop in KEM decapsulation/encapsulation compared to the GPR 
> related instructions where the overhead of performing the limb splits and 
> reconstruction did not compensate enough for the efficiencies of SIMD 
> parallelism.
> 
> ---------
> - [X] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 3f03e104
Author:    Shawn Emery <[email protected]>
Committer: Andrew Dinn <[email protected]>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/3f03e104edbcfdc8465415e20882950d2b7d3dee
Stats:     131 lines in 3 files changed: 131 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics

Reviewed-by: adinn, shade

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31409

Reply via email to